In 2004 The Partnership for 21st Century skills released a document that should have everyone in the world of education jumping through their hatbands. Although there are some articles touting the efficacy of this bit of research, there isn’t quite the fanfare one would expect for such a project. I have my theories as to why we might want to ignore a project that turns our current learning model on its ear. But it is out there.
Cutting edge businesses such as Apple, Blackboard, Intel, Lego, Microsoft, Oracle, Verizon, Cisco and many others are deeply involved in the conversation to raise awareness. If we pay attention to what progressive business leaders and visionary educators have to say about why, what and how we are teaching rather than how much it costs to prop up the old model, we might see positive, groundbreaking, grassroots social change. According to Ken Kay, President of the Partnership for 21st Century Skills, (this link is less than a minute and worth your time). “There is no doubt that creating an aligned 21st century education system that prepares students, workers and citizens to triumph in the global skills race is the central economic competitiveness issue for the next decade.”
The Partnership for 21st Century Skills arts map is a simple, colorful, 17 page, brochure-style document that can be used for curriculum development in all areas. There are four other skills maps and three literacy maps as well as a variety of other resources and valuable information. Each of the maps comes with a more precise framework definition document. The entire project looks to the future of knowledge and education. The emphasis on media literacy, life skills and technology seems a no-brainer, but we avoid considering the obvious because of economic short-sightedness.
It is no surprise to arts teachers that the Partnership for 21st Century Skills has at its core an education model that looks very similar to the one arts educators have been using for decades. It features critical thinking, collaboration and innovation and emphasizes integrated learning. For some of us, integrated means we made an art project depicting the Lewis & Clark expedition. But for arts educators we understand the value of integration in our curriculum. It isn’t necessary to explain to students that “today we are going to learn a math skill” when they enlarge an art project using a grid. We don’t have to explain integration of physics in our curriculum when demonstrating how the pulley system works to operate the grand curtain at a stage proscenium. There is no discussion of a history lesson when the choir teacher explains the Baroque period. It is commonly accepted that all arts teachers are integrative. It is not otherwise possible to teach an arts class. I am by no means suggesting that science teachers do not expect to teach some writing skills or that English teachers wouldn’t run across a history lesson. I am saying that our current model compartmentalizes learning in a way that has no parallel in the real world.
If we are to address widespread resignation, poverty, labor skills deficits, teen suicide, juvenile crime and our economic position in a global market, we must first address the most profound influence on young people outside their families; we must transform our education system. If we do not, we will see a continued increase in the gap between haves and have-nots, a rising budget deficit, decreased standing in a world market and an eventual slide into 2nd World status. It is time we got serious about joining the 21st Century.